000 | 02045nam a22004938a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | BDZ0001103503 | ||
003 | StDuBDS | ||
005 | 20180923141811.0 | ||
008 | 960809s1996 enk f 000 0 eng d | ||
010 | _a96010033 | ||
020 |
_a9780761904458 (hbk.) : _c�44.95 |
||
020 |
_a9780761904465 (pbk.) : _c�20.50 |
||
020 | _a0761904468 (pbk. : acid-free paper) | ||
040 |
_aStDuBDS _cStDuBDS _dStDuBDSZ |
||
049 | _aYQAA | ||
072 | 7 |
_aSOC _2ukslc |
|
072 | 7 |
_aDN _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aGTC _2thema |
|
072 | 7 |
_aJHBC _2thema |
|
082 | 0 | _a001.4 GIR | |
100 | 1 | _aGirden, Ellen R. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aEvaluating research articles from start to finish. _cEllen R. Girden. |
260 |
_aLondon : _bSAGE, _c1996. |
||
300 | _a288p. | ||
504 | _aIncludes bibliographical references. | ||
505 | 0 | _aIntroduction : threats to internal validity, threats to statistical conclusion validity, plan of the critiques -- Two sample studies -- Case studies -- Narrative analysis -- Surveys -- Correlation studies -- Regression analysis studies -- Factor analytic studies -- Discriminant analysis studies -- Two-condition experimental studies -- Single classification studies -- Factorial studies -- Quasi-experimental studies. | |
520 | 8 | _aGirden uses examples of good as well as flawed research studies and explains how to decide whether the conclusions reported in an article are justified on the basis of the design and analysis of the experiment. | |
650 | 0 | _aResearch design and methods. | |
650 | 0 |
_aResearch _xStatistical methods |
|
650 | 0 |
_aResearch _xEvaluation |
|
650 | 0 |
_aSocial sciences _xResearch _xEvaluation |
|
650 | 2 | _aData Collection. | |
650 | 2 | _aBiometry. | |
650 | 2 | _aResearch Design. | |
650 | 2 | _aResearch. | |
650 | 7 |
_aSociety. _2ukslc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aBiography & non-fiction prose _2thema |
|
650 | 7 |
_aCommunication studies _2thema |
|
650 | 7 |
_aSocial research & statistics _2thema |
|
902 | _a170814 | ||
907 |
_a.b10096371 _bmain _c- |
||
942 | _n0 | ||
998 |
_b1 _c010831 _dm _ea _f- _g0 |
||
999 |
_c3320 _d3320 |