Developing the credit-based modular curriculum in higher education / Mick Betts, Robin Smith.
Material type: TextPublication details: London : Falmer Press, 1998.Description: 167p. ; 24cmISBN:- 9780750708906 (pbk) :
- 0750708905
- Subtitle from cover: Challenge, choice, and change
- 378.41 BET
Item type | Current library | Call number | Copy number | Status | Date due | Barcode | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Long Loan | TUS: Midlands, Main Library Athlone General Lending | 378.41 BET (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | 1 | Available | 205751 |
Cover subtitle: Challenge, choice and change.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
Part 1 The universal curriculum: Patterns of provision; contained provision; Boundaried Provision;Combined Model; Negotiated Provision; Organised flexibility fields and sets; modules and credit module; size module; volume module; levels module; learning outcomes; module assessment. Part 2 Development and implementation: Standards and assessment; examination boards; the nature of assessment; degree classification; capitalizing on Flexibility; Negotiated Programmes; Work-Based Learning; The accreditation of prior and experiential learning definitions - AOIMP and APEL; building confidence in APEL; issues of management and control; issues of the relevance of prior learning; the shelf-life of prior learning - issues of currency credit contributing to more than one award - changing mindsets; how much APEL?; integrating prior and new learning issues with grades, levels and volume; issues of costing and charging; issues for full-time students; quality matters; programme validation; individual student validation monitoring; managing and resourcing; CBMS Information Technology; resourcing and planning higher education in the learning society - issues for credit-based modular systems.
This text provides guidance for building curriculum structures and examines the models that can be used. Options such as accreditation of prior and experiential learning, incompany accreditation, work-based learning, negotiated awards, and transparency of education assessment are explored.